Agitated Chaotic Events, Non-Firearm Officer-Associated and In-Custody Deaths Instructor Program (version 7.0)
Individuals experiencing a mind-body disconnect are increasing and a growing risk management concern for public safety agencies and officers, given the increased criminal and civil prosecution of officers and/or municipalities, a trend that shows no signs of slowing. California has enacted a statute that can hold Peace Officers criminally accountable for individuals who die from asphyxiation, if they cause a subject's respiratory airway to be compressed or if they impair a person's breathing or respiratory capacity, which includes application of pressure or body weight to a person's neck, torso, or back. This includes restraint methods.
In 2010, IPICD staff have encouraged public safety agencies, 9-1-1 dispatchers, officers, and others to adopt the term "Agitated Chaotic Events" (ACE) for describing those individuals experiencing a mind-body disconnect experience. ACE is a nonmedical and/or non-psychological term that does not attempt to identify the underlying "cause" of the individual's erratic and agitated behaviors. There can be many causes of such behaviors, and public safety officers are not trained to make medical and/or psychological diagnoses. One or more states have passed legislation classifying "excited delirium" as not being a "medical emergency," which impacts the use of the sedatives on active, combative, and/or agitated individuals. Two EMS providers were criminally convicted following a person's death after they used a sedative to calm a combative suspect following capture, control, and restraint by peace officers. Other measures, including restrictions on law enforcement officer tactical responses to these mind-body disconnect events, have been adopted or proposed in other states that may impact law enforcement and first responder actions. This instructor program will help you and your governmental entity to minimize and/or eliminate potential liability through a proactive risk management educational and training strategy.
Thoughtfully revised and updated using video, animation, case study, and demonstration, this IPICD Instructor program is based upon scientific, medical, experiential, and legal research including evidence-based practices, and is the most current and comprehensive multidisciplinary program available on the subject. The disputed term “Excited Delirium” is discussed using scientific and evidence-based findings that include the official position of the American Psychological Association (APA), the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP), and the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP). Diagnostic criteria for delirium and agitation are discussed and shown how they mirror the behaviors of a person in an agitated, mind-body disconnect.
TOPICS (Version 7.0) Current Societal Culture and Police Accountability
Societal demands: accountability and transparency
Criminal prosecution of officers
Capture, not combat: The changing paradigm
Force use frequency by officers in the United States (statistical summary)
Critical thinking basics for first responders
Officer-Associated vs. In-Custody Deaths
Legal definitions
Medical definitions
Factors Increasing Mortality Risk for Sudden Cardiac Death
History of sudden death
Who is at risk?
Immutable (Gender and Race)
Health (Pre-disposing and current)
Genetic
Incident Activity
Substances (licit and illicit)
Sickle cell trait
Anger
Restraint Concerns
Restraint Methods (including Restraint Chairs and Spit Restraint Devices)
Prone Restraint, Sudden Cardiac Arrest, and Sudden Death
Subject Positioning: New medical theory challenging "positional asphyxia" prone restraint deaths
Abnormal Breathing: An Overview
Normal vs. impaired breathing
Respiration vs. ventilation
Asphyxia vs. Asphyxiated vs. Asphyxiation (8 categories)
Identifying breathing distress signs in humans
Behavioral Cues
Definition and Application
Psychological
Communication
Physiological
Agitated Chaotic Events (ACE): Causes and Intervention Evidence-Based Practices
Distraction Devices (primary, secondary, tactical, and operational risks)
Electronic Control Weapons (primary, secondary, tactical, and operational risks)
Impact Tools (primary, secondary, tactical, and operational risks)
Spit Restraint Devices (primary, secondary, tactical, and operational risks)
Restraint Equipment (primary, secondary, tactical, and operational risks)
Suicide and Suicide-by-Cop
Definitions
Research findings and their impact on agency policy
Response parameters
The Ultimate Focus: Causation
Scientific vs. Legal vs. Medical Causation
Role of Medical Examiners and Coroners
Significance of Physical Autopsy and Findings
Significance of Psychological Autopsy and Findings
Significance of Jury Instructions
Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA)
Definitions of disability
Applying ADA on the street, in the jail, and in your classroom
Invisible and Visible Disabilities
Reasonable Accommodations
Investigation Guidelines
Body-worn camera video and audio
Surveillance video
Cellular telephone video and audio
Scientific Role of the Incident Report
Investigation Checklist
Developing and Teaching a User-Level program
Onsite Contact Timothy E. Trent Training Coordinator Central Virginia Criminal Justice Academy 434-455-6198 Office
INSTRUCTORS A. David Berman, CLS, M.S. and/or John G. Peters, Jr., CLS, Ph.D. are the primary instructors. Backgrounds of the instructors can be reviewed at www.ipicd.com .
TUITION $595 per person. Materials include Lesson Guide, Learner Companion study aids, sample User-Level PowerPoint® slide deck, articles, table-top exercises, authorized access to the IPICD website supplemental pages to stay current with new research and analyses, assessment, certificate, and more.
INSTRUCTOR CERTIFICATE Upon successful completion of the instruction and an assessment, you will receive an instructor certificate. Successful completion of this IPICD 16-hour instructional program qualifies you as an instructor to teach a User-Level program to your colleagues and others to save lives, to save careers, to minimize governmental entity liability, and to minimize officer liability.